Editorial Independence
Our content is written to inform readers, not to sell a particular operator. Assessments start with who runs a casino and what its documents commit it to, and only then move on to promotions, games and presentation. When the evidence is too thin or too contradictory to support a firm view, we say so openly.
Evidence Hierarchy
Not all sources are equally reliable, so we rank them:
- Regulator records such as public licence registers and enforcement notices.
- Operator documents including general terms, bonus rules, payment policies and privacy notices.
- Live site information such as cashier options and game information panels, noted with the date observed.
- Support answers, which can clarify a rule but never replace the written terms.
Marketing claims, trust seals and third-party ratings are treated as statements to be checked, not as evidence in themselves. Where sources disagree, we report the disagreement rather than picking the most attractive figure. We do not claim to have deposited or withdrawn money at a casino unless that has been specifically documented.
Review Criteria
| Criterion | Questions we ask |
|---|---|
| Ownership and licence | Does the named company match the licence and the exact domain? |
| Withdrawals | What are the limits, fees, pending times and verification steps? |
| Bonus terms | How is wagering calculated, and what caps, expiry and stake limits apply? |
| Payments | Which methods work for both deposits and payouts, and in which currencies? |
| Games | Are providers identifiable and are rules and RTP shown per title? |
| Player protection | Which limits, time-outs, closure and complaint options exist? |
How Serious Weaknesses Are Treated
Issues that put a player's money or right of complaint at risk, such as unclear ownership or harsh withdrawal clauses, carry far more weight than cosmetic shortcomings. A generous welcome offer or a large game library cannot make up for missing company details or vague financial terms.
How Commercial Links Fit In
Some pages include affiliate links, and the commissions they generate can influence which operators are shown and in what order. Ratings reflect our editorial judgement only and are not a licence, certificate or regulatory approval of any kind.
Keeping Content Current and Fixing Errors
Pages are reviewed and revised when operators change their terms or when new verifiable information appears. The update date shows when a page was last edited and does not imply that every item was re-tested that day. Anyone can flag a possible error through the Contact page; each report is checked against evidence and corrected where justified.